Abk�rzung zur Hauptnavigation Abk�rzung zu den Newsmeldungen Abk�rzung zu den Topstories  
  Barrierefreiheit    Kontakt MedUni Wien    Intranet    MedUni Wien - Shop    Universitätsbibliothek    Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien  
 
ccc_logo_en.gif
 
AKH Wien
 
 
Hauptnavigation
  • Livestream 2021
  • Home
  • Über das CCC
    • Allgemeines
    • Leitung der Organisationseinheit
    • CCC-Office Team
    • Kliniken und Partner
    • Qualitätsmanagement
    • Kontakt
  • PatientInnen
    • Covid-19
    • Allgemeines
    • Cancer School
    • Terminvereinbarung
    • Pflegeambulanz
    • PatientInnenvertretung
    • Links
  • Klinischer Bereich
    • Allgemeines
    • CCC Tumorboards
  • Wissenschaft & Forschung
    • Young CCC
    • CCC-ExpertInnenvideos
    • CCC Forschungscluster
    • CCC Units
    • CCC Platforms
    • Translationale Forschung
    • CCC Best Paper Award
    • CCC-TRIO Symposium
    • Kontakt/Links
  • Lehre
    • CCC Cancer School
    • Vienna International Summer School on Clinical and Experimental Oncology - VSSO
    • CCC Excellence Lecture
    • Interdisziplinäre onkologische Ausbildung
    • Klinisch-Praktisches Jahr (KPJ)
    • PhD Programme
    • Postgraduelle Fort- und Weiterbildung
    • Information/Contact
 
 
Subnavigation
    Inhaltsbereich


    Zurück zur Übersicht
    European urology. 2020 Jul 2. pii: S0302-2838(20)30472-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.043
    Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought.
    Bravi CA1,  Fossati N2,  Gandaglia G3,  Suardi N4,  Mazzone E5,  Robesti D6,  Osmonov D7,  Juenemann KP8,  Boeri L9,  Jeffrey Karnes R10,  Kretschmer A11,  Buchner A12,  Stief C13,  Hiester A14,  Nini A15,  Albers P16,  Devos G17,  Joniau S18,  Van Poppel H19,  Shariat SF20,  Heidenreich A21,  Pfister D22,  Tilki D23,  Graefen M24,  Gill IS25,  Mottrie A26,  Karakiewicz PI27,  Montorsi F28,  Briganti A29
    Author information
    1Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
    2Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
    3Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
    4Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
    5Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
    6Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
    7Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
    8Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
    9Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Urology, IRCCS Foundation Ca Granda, Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
    10Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
    11Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
    12Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
    13Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
    14Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
    15Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Homburg, Germany.
    16Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
    17Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
    18Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
    19Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
    20Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
    21Department of Urology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
    22Department of Urology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
    23Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
    24Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
    25USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    26Department of Urology, OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst, Melle, Belgium.
    27Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
    28Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
    29Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: briganti.alberto@hsr.it.
    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of patients treated with salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) remain unknown.

    OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term oncological outcomes after sLND in a large multi-institutional series.

    DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 189 patients who experienced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise and nodal-only recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and underwent sLND at 11 tertiary referral centers between 2002 and 2011. Lymph node recurrence was documented by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan using either C-choline or Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand.

    OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome of the study was cancer-specific mortality (CSM). The secondary outcomes were overall mortality, clinical recurrence (CR), biochemical recurrence (BCR), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival after sLND. The probability of freedom from each outcome was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Cox regression analysis was used to predict the risk of prostate CSM after accounting for several parameters, including the use of additional treatments after sLND.

    RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At long term, 110 and 163 patients experienced CR and BCR, respectively, with CR-free and BCR-free survival at 10 yr of 31% and 11%, respectively. After sLND, a total of 145 patients received ADT, with a median time to ADT of 41 mo. At a median (interquartile range) follow-up for survivors of 87 (51, 104) mo, 48 patients died. Of them, 45 died from PCa. The probabilities of freedom from cancer-specific and all-cause death at 10 yr were 66% and 64%, respectively. Similar results were obtained in sensitivity analyses in patients with pelvic-only positive PET/CT scan, as well as after excluding men on ADT at PET/CT scan and patients with PSA level at sLND higher than the 75th percentile. At multivariable analyses, patients who had PSA response after sLND (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.45; p = 0.001), and those receiving ADT within 6 mo from sLND (HR: 0.51; p = 0.010) had lower risk of death from PCa.

    CONCLUSIONS: A third of men treated with sLND for PET-detected nodal recurrence of PCa died at long term, with PCa being the main cause of death. Salvage LND alone was associated with durable long-term outcomes in a minority of men who significantly benefited from additional treatments after surgery. Taken together, all these data argue against the use of metastasis-directed therapy alone for patients with node-only recurrent PCa. These men should instead be considered at high risk of systemic dissemination already at the time of sLND.

    PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed long-term outcomes of patients treated with salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for node-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). In contrast with prior evidence, we found that the majority of these men recurred after sLND and eventually died from PCa. A significant survival benefit associated with the administration of androgen deprivation therapy after sLND suggests that sLND should be considered part of a multimodal approach rather than an exclusive treatment strategy.


    Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

    KEYWORDS: Androgen deprivation therapy, Metastasis-directed therapy, Neoplasm recurrence, Positron emission tomography scan, Prostate cancer, Salvage lymph node dissection

    Publikations ID: 32624288
    Quelle: öffnen
     
    Drucken
     
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif

    Schnellinfo

     
    -- Initiative Krebsforschung / Krebsforschungslauf

    -- Cancer Care
    -- Kliniken und Partner
    -- CCC Cancer School
    -- Young CCC
    -- CCC Tumorboards
    -- CCC Forschungscluster
    -- CCC Units
    -- CCC Platforms
    -- SOPs / Leitlinien
    -- Kontakt
    Zuklappen
     
    Ausklappen
     
     

    Featured

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    © MedUni Wien |
     Impressum | Nutzungsbedingungen | Kontakt