Abk�rzung zur Hauptnavigation Abk�rzung zu den Newsmeldungen Abk�rzung zu den Topstories  
  Barrierefreiheit    Kontakt MedUni Wien    Intranet    MedUni Wien - Shop    Universitätsbibliothek    Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien  
 
ccc_logo_en.gif
 
AKH Wien
 
 
Hauptnavigation
  • Livestream 2021
  • Home
  • Über das CCC
    • Allgemeines
    • Leitung der Organisationseinheit
    • CCC-Office Team
    • Kliniken und Partner
    • Qualitätsmanagement
    • Kontakt
  • PatientInnen
    • Covid-19
    • Allgemeines
    • Cancer School
    • Terminvereinbarung
    • Pflegeambulanz
    • PatientInnenvertretung
    • Links
  • Klinischer Bereich
    • Allgemeines
    • CCC Tumorboards
  • Wissenschaft & Forschung
    • Young CCC
    • CCC-ExpertInnenvideos
    • CCC Forschungscluster
    • CCC Units
    • CCC Platforms
    • Translationale Forschung
    • CCC Best Paper Award
    • CCC-TRIO Symposium
    • Kontakt/Links
  • Lehre
    • CCC Cancer School
    • Vienna International Summer School on Clinical and Experimental Oncology - VSSO
    • CCC Excellence Lecture
    • Interdisziplinäre onkologische Ausbildung
    • Klinisch-Praktisches Jahr (KPJ)
    • PhD Programme
    • Postgraduelle Fort- und Weiterbildung
    • Information/Contact
 
 
Subnavigation
    Inhaltsbereich


    Zurück zur Übersicht
    Annals of surgery. 2019 Aug 5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003504
    The Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Site Differs According to the KRAS Mutational Status: A Study By the International Genetic Consortium for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.
    Margonis GA1,  Amini N2,  Buettner S3,  Kim Y4,  Wang J5,  Andreatos N6,  Wagner D7,  Sasaki K8,  Beer A9,  Kamphues C10,  Morioka D11,  Løes IM12,  Imai K13,  He J14,  Pawlik TM15,  Kaczirek K16,  Poultsides G17,  Lønning PE18,  Burkhart R19,  Endo I20,  Baba H21,  Mischinger HJ22,  Aucejo FN23,  Kreis ME24,  Wolfgang CL25,  Weiss MJ26
    Author information
    1Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    2Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    3Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    4Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and the Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston: Massachusetts.
    5Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    6Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    7Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
    8Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
    9Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
    10Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
    11Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
    12Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, and Department of Oncology, Haukeland University, Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
    13Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
    14Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    15Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
    16Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
    17Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
    18Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, and Department of Oncology, Haukeland University, Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
    19Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    20Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
    21Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
    22Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
    23Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
    24Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
    25Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    26Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognostic impact of tumor laterality in colon cancer liver metastases (CLM) after stratifying by Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutational status.

    BACKGROUND: Although some studies have demonstrated that patients with CLM from a right sided (RS) primary cancer fare worse, others have found equivocal outcomes of patients with CLM with RS versus left-sided (LS) primary tumors. Importantly, recent evidence from unresectable metastatic CRC suggests that tumor laterality impacts prognosis only in those with wild-type tumors.

    METHODS: Patients with rectal or transverse colon tumors and those with unknown KRAS mutational status were excluded from analysis. The prognostic impact of RS versus LS primary CRC was determined after stratifying by KRAS mutational status.

    RESULTS: 277 patients had a RS (38.6%) and 441 (61.4%) had a LS tumor. Approximately one-third of tumors (28.1%) harbored KRAS mutations. In the entire cohort, RS was associated with worse 5-year overall survival (OS) compared with LS (39.4% vs 50.8%, P = 0.03) and remained significantly associated with worse OS in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.45, P = 0.04). In wild-type patients, a worse 5-year OS associated with a RS tumor was evident in univariable analysis (43.7% vs 55.5%, P = 0.02) and persisted in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.49, P = 0.01). In contrast, among patients with KRAS mutated tumors, tumor laterality had no impact on 5-year OS, even in the univariable analysis (32.8% vs 34.0%, P = 0.38).

    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated, for the first time, that the prognostic impact of primary tumor side differs according to KRAS mutational status. RS tumors were associated with worse survival only in patients with wild-type tumors.


    Publikations ID: 31389831
    Quelle: öffnen
     
    Drucken
     
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif

    Schnellinfo

     
    -- Initiative Krebsforschung / Krebsforschungslauf

    -- Cancer Care
    -- Kliniken und Partner
    -- CCC Cancer School
    -- Young CCC
    -- CCC Tumorboards
    -- CCC Forschungscluster
    -- CCC Units
    -- CCC Platforms
    -- SOPs / Leitlinien
    -- Kontakt
    Zuklappen
     
    Ausklappen
     
     

    Featured

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    © MedUni Wien |
     Impressum | Nutzungsbedingungen | Kontakt