Abk�rzung zur Hauptnavigation Abk�rzung zu den Newsmeldungen Abk�rzung zu den Topstories  
  Barrierefreiheit    Kontakt MedUni Wien    Intranet    MedUni Wien - Shop    Universitätsbibliothek    Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien  
 
ccc_logo_en.gif
 
AKH Wien
 
 
Hauptnavigation
  • Livestream 2021
  • Home
  • Über das CCC
    • Allgemeines
    • Leitung der Organisationseinheit
    • CCC-Office Team
    • Kliniken und Partner
    • Qualitätsmanagement
    • Kontakt
  • PatientInnen
    • Covid-19
    • Allgemeines
    • Cancer School
    • Terminvereinbarung
    • Pflegeambulanz
    • PatientInnenvertretung
    • Links
  • Klinischer Bereich
    • Allgemeines
    • CCC Tumorboards
  • Wissenschaft & Forschung
    • Young CCC
    • CCC-ExpertInnenvideos
    • CCC Forschungscluster
    • CCC Units
    • CCC Platforms
    • Translationale Forschung
    • CCC Best Paper Award
    • CCC-TRIO Symposium
    • Kontakt/Links
  • Lehre
    • CCC Cancer School
    • Vienna International Summer School on Clinical and Experimental Oncology - VSSO
    • CCC Excellence Lecture
    • Interdisziplinäre onkologische Ausbildung
    • Klinisch-Praktisches Jahr (KPJ)
    • PhD Programme
    • Postgraduelle Fort- und Weiterbildung
    • Information/Contact
 
 
Subnavigation
    Inhaltsbereich


    Zurück zur Übersicht
    Urologic oncology. 2017 Nov 9. pii: S1078-1439(17)30543-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.008
    Impact of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy on oncological outcomes: Results from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium (IRCC-VTC).
    Tilki D1,  Chandrasekar T2,  Capitanio U3,  Ciancio G4,  Daneshmand S5,  Gontero P6,  Gonzalez J7,  Haferkamp A8,  Hohenfellner M9,  Huang WC10,  Linares Espinós E11,  Lorentz A12,  Martinez-Salamanca JI13,  Master VA14,  McKiernan JM15,  Montorsi F16,  Novara G17,  Pahernik S18,  Palou J19,  Pruthi RS20,  Rodriguez-Faba O21,  Russo P22,  Scherr DS23,  Shariat SF24,  Spahn M25,  Terrone C26,  Vera-Donoso C27,  Zigeuner R28,  Libertino JA29,  Evans CP30
    Author information
    1Department of Urology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
    2Department of Urology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
    3Department of Urology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Milano, Italy.
    4Department of Urology, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
    5Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.
    6Department of Urology, A.O.U. San Giovanni Battista, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
    7Department of Urology, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
    8Department of Urology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
    9Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
    10Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, NY.
    11Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain.
    12Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
    13Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
    14Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
    15Department of Urology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, NY.
    16Department of Urology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Milano, Italy.
    17Department of Urology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
    18Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
    19Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
    20Department of Urology, UNC at Chappel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
    21Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
    22Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY.
    23Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York City, NY.
    24Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
    25Department of Urology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
    26Division of Urology, Maggiore della Carita Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
    27Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
    28Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
    29Department of Urology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA.
    30Department of Urology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: cpevans@ucdavis.edu.
    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy on oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and tumor thrombus.

    PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 1,978 patients with RCC and tumor thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy from 1985 to 2014 at 24 centers were analyzed. None of the patients had distant metastases. Extent and pathologic results of LND were compared with respect to cancer-specific survival (CSS). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to quantify the effect of multiple covariates.

    RESULTS: LND was performed in 1,026 patients. In multivariable analysis, the presence of LN metastasis, the number of positive LNs, and LN density were independently associated with cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Clinical node-negative (cN-) disease was documented in 573 patients, 447 of them underwent LND with 43 cN- patients (9.6%) revealing positive LNs at pathology. LN positive cN- patients showed significantly better CSS when compared to LN positive cN+ patients. In multivariable analysis, positive cN status in LN positive patients was a significant predictor of CSM (HR, 2.923; P = 0.015).

    CONCLUSIONS: The number of positive nodes harvested during LND and LN density was strong prognostic indicators of CSS, while number of removed LNs did not have a significant effect on CSS. The rate of pN1 patients among clinically node-negative patients was relatively high, and LND in these patients suggested a survival benefit. However, only a randomized trial can determine the absolute benefit of LND in this setting.


    Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    KEYWORDS: Inferior vena cava, Lymph node metastasis, Lymphadenectomy, Renal cell carcinoma, Survival, Vena cava tumor thrombectomy

    Publikations ID: 29129353
    Quelle: öffnen
     
    Drucken
     
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif

    Schnellinfo

     
    -- Initiative Krebsforschung / Krebsforschungslauf

    -- Cancer Care
    -- Kliniken und Partner
    -- CCC Cancer School
    -- Young CCC
    -- CCC Tumorboards
    -- CCC Forschungscluster
    -- CCC Units
    -- CCC Platforms
    -- SOPs / Leitlinien
    -- Kontakt
    Zuklappen
     
    Ausklappen
     
     

    Featured

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    © MedUni Wien |
     Impressum | Nutzungsbedingungen | Kontakt