Abk�rzung zur Hauptnavigation Abk�rzung zu den Newsmeldungen Abk�rzung zu den Topstories  
  Barrierefreiheit    Kontakt MedUni Wien    Intranet    MedUni Wien - Shop    Universitätsbibliothek    Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien  
 
ccc_logo_en.gif
 
AKH Wien
 
 
Hauptnavigation
  • Livestream 2021
  • Home
  • Über das CCC
    • Allgemeines
    • Leitung der Organisationseinheit
    • CCC-Office Team
    • Kliniken und Partner
    • Qualitätsmanagement
    • Kontakt
  • PatientInnen
    • Covid-19
    • Allgemeines
    • Cancer School
    • Terminvereinbarung
    • Pflegeambulanz
    • PatientInnenvertretung
    • Links
  • Klinischer Bereich
    • Allgemeines
    • CCC Tumorboards
  • Wissenschaft & Forschung
    • Young CCC
    • CCC-ExpertInnenvideos
    • CCC Forschungscluster
    • CCC Units
    • CCC Platforms
    • Translationale Forschung
    • CCC Best Paper Award
    • CCC-TRIO Symposium
    • Kontakt/Links
  • Lehre
    • CCC Cancer School
    • Vienna International Summer School on Clinical and Experimental Oncology - VSSO
    • CCC Excellence Lecture
    • Interdisziplinäre onkologische Ausbildung
    • Klinisch-Praktisches Jahr (KPJ)
    • PhD Programme
    • Postgraduelle Fort- und Weiterbildung
    • Information/Contact
 
 
Subnavigation
    Inhaltsbereich


    Zurück zur Übersicht
    Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2017 Apr 13. pii: jnumed.117.190827. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.190827
    (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Cancer Assessments: An International Multicenter Prospective Study.
    Fendler WP1,  Calais J2,  Allen-Auerbach M3,  Bluemel C4,  Eberhardt N5,  Emmett L6,  Gupta P7,  Hartenbach M8,  Hope TA9,  Okamoto S10,  Pfob CH11,  Pöppel TD12,  Rischpler C13,  Schwarzenböck S14,  Stebner V15,  Unterrainer M16,  Zacho HD17,  Maurer T18,  Gratzke C19,  Crispin A20,  Czernin J21,  Herrmann K22,  Eiber M23
    Author information
    1Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California wfendler@mednet.ucla.edu.
    2Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
    3Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
    4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
    5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
    6Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia, and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
    7Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
    8Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
    9Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California.
    10Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
    11Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
    12Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
    13Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
    14Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
    15Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
    16Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
    17Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
    18Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
    19Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and.
    20Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.
    21Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
    22Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
    23Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
    Abstract

    The interobserver agreement for (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study interpretations in patients with prostate cancer is unknown. Methods:(68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was performed in 50 patients with prostate cancer for biochemical recurrence (n = 25), primary diagnosis (n = 10), biochemical persistence after primary therapy (n = 5), or staging of known metastatic disease (n = 10). Images were reviewed by 16 observers who used a standardized approach for interpretation of local (T), nodal (N), bone (Mb), or visceral (Mc) involvement. Observers were classified as having a low (<30 prior (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT studies; n = 5), intermediate (30-300 studies; n = 5), or high level of experience (>300 studies; n = 6). Histopathology (n = 25, 50%), post-external-beam radiation therapy prostate-specific antigen response (n = 15, 30%), or follow-up PET/CT (n = 10, 20%) served as a standard of reference. Observer groups were compared by overall agreement (% patients matching the standard of reference) and Fleiss' κ with mean and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Agreement among all observers was substantial for T (κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.59-0.64) and N (κ = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.76) staging and almost perfect for Mb (κ = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.91) staging. Level of experience positively correlated with agreement for T (κ = 0.73/0.66/0.50 for high/intermediate/low experience, respectively), N (κ = 0.80/0.76/0.64, respectively), and Mc staging (κ = 0.61/0.46/0.36, respectively). Interobserver agreement for Mb was almost perfect irrespective of prior experience (κ = 0.87/0.91/0.88, respectively). Observers with low experience, when compared with intermediate and high experience, demonstrated significantly lower median overall agreement (54% vs. 66% and 76%, P = 0.041) and specificity for T staging (73% vs. 88% and 93%, P = 0.032). Conclusion: The interpretation of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for prostate cancer staging is highly consistent among observers with high levels of experience, especially for nodal and bone assessments. Initial training on at least 30 patient cases is recommended to ensure acceptable performance.


    © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

    KEYWORDS: PET/CT, PSMA, agreement, interobserver, prostate cancer, reproducibility

    Publikations ID: 28408531
    Quelle: öffnen
     
    Drucken
     
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif

    Schnellinfo

     
    -- Initiative Krebsforschung / Krebsforschungslauf

    -- Cancer Care
    -- Kliniken und Partner
    -- CCC Cancer School
    -- Young CCC
    -- CCC Tumorboards
    -- CCC Forschungscluster
    -- CCC Units
    -- CCC Platforms
    -- SOPs / Leitlinien
    -- Kontakt
    Zuklappen
     
    Ausklappen
     
     

    Featured

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    © MedUni Wien |
     Impressum | Nutzungsbedingungen | Kontakt