Abk�rzung zur Hauptnavigation Abk�rzung zu den Newsmeldungen Abk�rzung zu den Topstories  
  Barrierefreiheit    Kontakt MedUni Wien    Intranet    MedUni Wien - Shop    Universitätsbibliothek    Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien  
 
ccc_logo_en.gif
 
AKH Wien
 
 
Hauptnavigation
  • Livestream 2021
  • Home
  • Über das CCC
    • Allgemeines
    • Leitung der Organisationseinheit
    • CCC-Office Team
    • Kliniken und Partner
    • Qualitätsmanagement
    • Kontakt
  • PatientInnen
    • Covid-19
    • Allgemeines
    • Cancer School
    • Terminvereinbarung
    • Pflegeambulanz
    • PatientInnenvertretung
    • Links
  • Klinischer Bereich
    • Allgemeines
    • CCC Tumorboards
  • Wissenschaft & Forschung
    • Young CCC
    • CCC-ExpertInnenvideos
    • CCC Forschungscluster
    • CCC Units
    • CCC Platforms
    • Translationale Forschung
    • CCC Best Paper Award
    • CCC-TRIO Symposium
    • Kontakt/Links
  • Lehre
    • CCC Cancer School
    • Vienna International Summer School on Clinical and Experimental Oncology - VSSO
    • CCC Excellence Lecture
    • Interdisziplinäre onkologische Ausbildung
    • Klinisch-Praktisches Jahr (KPJ)
    • PhD Programme
    • Postgraduelle Fort- und Weiterbildung
    • Information/Contact
 
 
Subnavigation
    Inhaltsbereich


    Zurück zur Übersicht
    BMC medical genomics. 2015 Aug 22. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0129-6. pii: 10.1186/s12920-015-0129-6. pmc: PMC4546262
    Development and verification of the PAM50-based Prosigna breast cancer gene signature assay.
    Wallden B1,  Storhoff J2,  Nielsen T3,  Dowidar N4,  Schaper C5,  Ferree S6,  Liu S7,  Leung S8,  Geiss G9,  Snider J10,  Vickery T11,  Davies SR12,  Mardis ER13,  Gnant M14,  Sestak I15,  Ellis MJ16,  Perou CM17,  Bernard PS18,  Parker JS19
    Author information
    1NanoString Technologies, Inc, 530 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. bwallden@nanostring.com.
    2NanoString Technologies, Inc, 530 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. jstorhoff@nanostring.com.
    3Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and British Columbia Cancer Agency, 2655 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. torsten@mail.ubc.ca.
    4NanoString Technologies, Inc, 530 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. ndowidar@nanostring.com.
    5Statistical consultant, New York, NY, USA. carl@carlschaper.com.
    6NanoString Technologies, Inc, 530 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. sferree@nanostring.com.
    7Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and British Columbia Cancer Agency, 2655 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. Shuzhen.Liu@vch.ca.
    8Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and British Columbia Cancer Agency, 2655 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. Samuel.Leung@vch.ca.
    9NanoString Technologies, Inc, 530 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. ggeiss@nanostring.com.
    10Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. jsnider@pathology.wustl.edu.
    11Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. tvickery@wustl.edu.
    12Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. daviess@wustl.edu.
    13Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. emardis@wustl.edu.
    14Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. michael.gnant@meduniwien.ac.at.
    15Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Sq, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK. i.sestak@qmul.ac.uk.
    16Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS 600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Matthew.Ellis@bcm.edu.
    17Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. cperou@med.unc.edu.
    18Huntsman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84103, USA. phil.bernard@hci.utah.edu.
    19Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. parkerjs@email.unc.edu.
    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: The four intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer, defined by differential expression of 50 genes (PAM50), have been shown to be predictive of risk of recurrence and benefit of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Here we describe the development of Prosigna™, a PAM50-based subtype classifier and risk model on the NanoString nCounter Dx Analysis System intended for decentralized testing in clinical laboratories.

    METHODS: 514 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer patient samples were used to train prototypical centroids for each of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer on the NanoString platform. Hierarchical cluster analysis of gene expression data was used to identify the prototypical centroids defined in previous PAM50 algorithm training exercises. 304 FFPE patient samples from a well annotated clinical cohort in the absence of adjuvant systemic therapy were then used to train a subtype-based risk model (i.e. Prosigna ROR score). 232 samples from a tamoxifen-treated patient cohort were used to verify the prognostic accuracy of the algorithm prior to initiating clinical validation studies.

    RESULTS: The gene expression profiles of each of the four Prosigna subtype centroids were consistent with those previously published using the PCR-based PAM50 method. Similar to previously published classifiers, tumor samples classified as Luminal A by Prosigna had the best prognosis compared to samples classified as one of the three higher-risk tumor subtypes. The Prosigna Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score model was verified to be significantly associated with prognosis as a continuous variable and to add significant information over both commonly available IHC markers and Adjuvant! Online.

    CONCLUSIONS: The results from the training and verification data sets show that the FDA-cleared and CE marked Prosigna test provides an accurate estimate of the risk of distant recurrence in hormone receptor positive breast cancer and is also capable of identifying a tumor's intrinsic subtype that is consistent with the previously published PCR-based PAM50 assay. Subsequent analytical and clinical validation studies confirm the clinical accuracy and technical precision of the Prosigna PAM50 assay in a decentralized setting.


    Publikations ID: 26297356
    Quelle: öffnen
     
    Drucken
     
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif

    Schnellinfo

     
    -- Initiative Krebsforschung / Krebsforschungslauf

    -- Cancer Care
    -- Kliniken und Partner
    -- CCC Cancer School
    -- Young CCC
    -- CCC Tumorboards
    -- CCC Forschungscluster
    -- CCC Units
    -- CCC Platforms
    -- SOPs / Leitlinien
    -- Kontakt
    Zuklappen
     
    Ausklappen
     
     

    Featured

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    © MedUni Wien |
     Impressum | Nutzungsbedingungen | Kontakt