Abk�rzung zur Hauptnavigation Abk�rzung zu den Newsmeldungen Abk�rzung zu den Topstories  
  Barrierefreiheit    Kontakt MedUni Wien    Intranet    MedUni Wien - Shop    Universitätsbibliothek    Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien  
 
ccc_logo_en.gif
 
AKH Wien
 
 
Hauptnavigation
  • Livestream 2021
  • Home
  • Über das CCC
    • Allgemeines
    • Leitung der Organisationseinheit
    • CCC-Office Team
    • Kliniken und Partner
    • Qualitätsmanagement
    • Kontakt
  • PatientInnen
    • Covid-19
    • Allgemeines
    • Cancer School
    • Terminvereinbarung
    • Pflegeambulanz
    • PatientInnenvertretung
    • Links
  • Klinischer Bereich
    • Allgemeines
    • CCC Tumorboards
  • Wissenschaft & Forschung
    • Young CCC
    • CCC-ExpertInnenvideos
    • CCC Forschungscluster
    • CCC Units
    • CCC Platforms
    • Translationale Forschung
    • CCC Best Paper Award
    • CCC-TRIO Symposium
    • Kontakt/Links
  • Lehre
    • CCC Cancer School
    • Vienna International Summer School on Clinical and Experimental Oncology - VSSO
    • CCC Excellence Lecture
    • Interdisziplinäre onkologische Ausbildung
    • Klinisch-Praktisches Jahr (KPJ)
    • PhD Programme
    • Postgraduelle Fort- und Weiterbildung
    • Information/Contact
 
 
Subnavigation
    Inhaltsbereich


    Zurück zur Übersicht
    The Journal of urology. 2015 Mar 19. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2948. pmc: PMC5012645. mid: NIHMS805073
    Cardiopulmonary Bypass has No Significant Impact on Survival in Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy and Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Multi-Institutional Analysis.
    Nguyen HG1,  Tilki D2,  Dall'Era MA3,  Durbin-Johnson B4,  Carballido JA5,  Chandrasekar T6,  Chromecki T7,  Ciancio G8,  Daneshmand S9,  Gontero P10,  Gonzalez J11,  Haferkamp A12,  Hohenfellner M13,  Huang WC14,  Espinós EL15,  Mandel P16,  Martinez-Salamanca JI17,  Master VA18,  McKiernan JM19,  Montorsi F20,  Novara G21,  Pahernik S22,  Palou J23,  Pruthi RS24,  Rodriguez-Faba O25,  Russo P26,  Scherr DS27,  Shariat SF28,  Spahn M29,  Terrone C30,  Vergho D31,  Wallen EM32,  Xylinas E33,  Zigeuner R34,  Libertino JA35,  Evans CP36
    Author information
    1Department of Urology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
    2Department of Urology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
    3Department of Urology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
    4Department of Urology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
    5Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
    6Department of Urology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
    7Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
    8Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
    9USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
    10Department of Urology, A.O.U. San Giovanni Battista, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
    11Department of Urology, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
    12Department of Urology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
    13Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
    14Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
    15Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
    16Institute of of Empirical Economic Research, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
    17Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
    18Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
    19Department of Urology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.
    20Department of Urology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Milano, Italy.
    21University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
    22Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
    23Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
    24Department of Urology, UNC at Chappel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
    25Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
    26Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
    27Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA.
    28Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
    29University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
    30Division of Urology, Maggiore della Carita Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
    31University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
    32Department of Urology, UNC at Chappel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
    33Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA.
    34Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
    35Department of Urology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
    36Department of Urology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
    Abstract

    PURPOSE: The impact of cardiopulmonary bypass in level III-IV tumor thrombectomy on surgical and oncologic outcomes is unknown. We determine the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass on overall and cancer specific survival, as well as surgical complication rates and immediate outcomes in patients undergoing nephrectomy and level III-IV tumor thrombectomy with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 362 patients with renal cell cancer and with level III or IV tumor thrombus from 1992 to 2012 at 22 U.S. and European centers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall and cancer specific survival between patients with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Perioperative mortality and complication rates were assessed using logistic regression analyses.

    RESULTS: Median overall survival was 24.6 months in noncardiopulmonary bypass cases and 26.6 months in cardiopulmonary bypass cases. Overall survival and cancer specific survival did not differ significantly in both groups on univariate analysis or when adjusting for known risk factors. On multivariate analysis no significant differences were seen in hospital length of stay, Clavien 1-4 complication rate, intraoperative or 30-day mortality and cancer specific survival. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study.

    CONCLUSIONS: In our multi-institutional analysis the use of cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly impact cancer specific survival or overall survival in patients undergoing nephrectomy and level III or IV tumor thrombectomy. Neither approach was independently associated with increased mortality on multivariate analysis. Greater surgical complications were not independently associated with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.


    Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    KEYWORDS: carcinoma, cardiopulmonary bypass, inferior, intraoperative complications, renal cell, survival, vena cava

    Publikations ID: 25797392
    Quelle: öffnen
     
    Drucken
     
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif
    ccc_logo_en.gif

    Schnellinfo

     
    -- Initiative Krebsforschung / Krebsforschungslauf

    -- Cancer Care
    -- Kliniken und Partner
    -- CCC Cancer School
    -- Young CCC
    -- CCC Tumorboards
    -- CCC Forschungscluster
    -- CCC Units
    -- CCC Platforms
    -- SOPs / Leitlinien
    -- Kontakt
    Zuklappen
     
    Ausklappen
     
     

    Featured

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    © MedUni Wien |
     Impressum | Nutzungsbedingungen | Kontakt